diff options
| author | jthorn <jthorn@e296648e-0e4f-0410-bd07-d597d9acff87> | 2002-10-22 17:41:38 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | jthorn <jthorn@e296648e-0e4f-0410-bd07-d597d9acff87> | 2002-10-22 17:41:38 +0000 |
| commit | f220dbc738b1ec8f92bd2be2b292c625a49f04ef (patch) | |
| tree | c7d0e6eee59a011c29ce67fe42d09623b59de378 /doc | |
| parent | 573179ce7cb7cc3545e4bdc90672f654c92c78d2 (diff) | |
add
> ----------------------------------------
> It would be nice if Exact supported fisheye.
> Failing that, it could at least check if FishEye is active
> and cleanly report an error.
> ----------------------------------------
> It would be nice if Exact supported the "static conformal" metric type.
> ----------------------------------------
also redo formatting to make it easier to separate entries visually
git-svn-id: http://svn.einsteintoolkit.org/cactus/EinsteinInitialData/Exact/trunk@131 e296648e-0e4f-0410-bd07-d597d9acff87
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/TODO | 21 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 2 deletions
@@ -1,18 +1,27 @@ -This is a "todo" list for this thorn +Things to do for this thorn +=========================== + $Header$ +---------------------------------------- + Ian Hawke: It would be nice to be able to output the difference between a numerical evolution and the exact solution. +---------------------------------------- Sascha Husa: It would be nice if Exact could set up variables other than the ADM ones (indeed it appears to not even grok BSSN right now). +---------------------------------------- + +Sascha Husa: The boundary setup needs to be generalized to handle ghost zones wider than 1 point. +---------------------------------------- Peter Diener: There's no documented way to generate an entire exact spacetime @@ -20,8 +29,8 @@ There's no documented way to generate an entire exact spacetime to do this, but it looks complicated. :( There ought to be a simple way of doing this! (And it ought to be documented simply, too!) +---------------------------------------- -many people: Every model should have .ge. 1 test case! Right now most of the models have no test cases at all, and this makes it way too easy for bugs to creep in and go undetected for a long time. @@ -35,3 +44,11 @@ momentum constraints too) and check that it (they) are suitably small. in turn requires ADMMacros.) This would help guard against typos, wrong formulas, and other "consistent, but wrong" cases. + +---------------------------------------- +It would be nice if Exact supported fisheye. +Failing that, it could at least check if FishEye is active + and cleanly report an error. +---------------------------------------- +It would be nice if Exact supported the "static conformal" metric type. +---------------------------------------- |