From f220dbc738b1ec8f92bd2be2b292c625a49f04ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jthorn Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:41:38 +0000 Subject: add > ---------------------------------------- > It would be nice if Exact supported fisheye. > Failing that, it could at least check if FishEye is active > and cleanly report an error. > ---------------------------------------- > It would be nice if Exact supported the "static conformal" metric type. > ---------------------------------------- also redo formatting to make it easier to separate entries visually git-svn-id: http://svn.einsteintoolkit.org/cactus/EinsteinInitialData/Exact/trunk@131 e296648e-0e4f-0410-bd07-d597d9acff87 --- doc/TODO | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/TODO b/doc/TODO index c01526c..9b1a3ae 100644 --- a/doc/TODO +++ b/doc/TODO @@ -1,18 +1,27 @@ -This is a "todo" list for this thorn +Things to do for this thorn +=========================== + $Header$ +---------------------------------------- + Ian Hawke: It would be nice to be able to output the difference between a numerical evolution and the exact solution. +---------------------------------------- Sascha Husa: It would be nice if Exact could set up variables other than the ADM ones (indeed it appears to not even grok BSSN right now). +---------------------------------------- + +Sascha Husa: The boundary setup needs to be generalized to handle ghost zones wider than 1 point. +---------------------------------------- Peter Diener: There's no documented way to generate an entire exact spacetime @@ -20,8 +29,8 @@ There's no documented way to generate an entire exact spacetime to do this, but it looks complicated. :( There ought to be a simple way of doing this! (And it ought to be documented simply, too!) +---------------------------------------- -many people: Every model should have .ge. 1 test case! Right now most of the models have no test cases at all, and this makes it way too easy for bugs to creep in and go undetected for a long time. @@ -35,3 +44,11 @@ momentum constraints too) and check that it (they) are suitably small. in turn requires ADMMacros.) This would help guard against typos, wrong formulas, and other "consistent, but wrong" cases. + +---------------------------------------- +It would be nice if Exact supported fisheye. +Failing that, it could at least check if FishEye is active + and cleanly report an error. +---------------------------------------- +It would be nice if Exact supported the "static conformal" metric type. +---------------------------------------- -- cgit v1.2.3