update from public Whisky version

git-svn-id: http://svn.einsteintoolkit.org/cactus/EinsteinEvolve/GRHydro/trunk@5 c83d129a-5a75-4d5a-9c4d-ed3a5855bf45

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/doc/documentation.tex b/doc/documentation.tex
index ed394ca..675cca8 100644
--- a/doc/documentation.tex
+++ b/doc/documentation.tex
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 
 % the date your document was last changed, if your document is in CVS, 
 % please use:
-\date{$ $Date: 2009-09-17 15:24:01 -0500 (Thu, 17 Sep 2009) $ $}
+\date{$ $Date: 2009-12-07 19:20:47 -0600 (Mon, 07 Dec 2009) $ $}
 \maketitle
 
 % *======================================================================*
@@ -263,9 +263,9 @@ we just haven't had the incentive).
 \subsection{Interaction With Other Thorns}
 
 {\tt Whisky} provides the appropriate contribution to the stress energy
-through the {\tt CalcTmunu} interface. Those spacetime evolvers that
-use this interface can use {\tt Whisky} without change. To pass the required
-variables across {\tt Whisky} is a friend of {\tt ADMCoupling}.
+through the {\tt TmunuBase} interface. Those spacetime evolvers that
+use this interface can use {\tt Whisky} without change. 
+%To pass the required variables across {\tt Whisky} is a friend of {\tt ADMCoupling}.
 
 {\tt Whisky} uses the {\tt MoL} thorn to perform the actual time
 evolution. This means that if all other evolution thorns are also
@@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ If your problem is not answered there then please send details to one
 of the maintainers listed below.
 
 The primary maintainers of {\tt Whisky} are Ian Hawke ({\tt
-  hawke@aei.mpg.de}), Luca Baiotti ({\tt baiotti@ea.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp}) and Frank L\"offler
-({\tt frank.loeffler@aei.mpg.de}). Email should always reach us faster than
+  hawke@aei.mpg.de}), Luca Baiotti ({\tt baiotti@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp}) and Frank L\"offler
+({\tt knarf@cct.lsu.edu}). Email should always reach us faster than
 other means and we will try to fix any problems as fast as possible.
 Problems with the web page should also be addressed to Frank.
 
@@ -321,12 +321,12 @@ maintainers. Examples would be
   ({\tt cactusmaint@cactuscode.org})
 \item {\tt EOS\_*}: Ian Hawke (although in this case I can't guarantee
   I'll be able to fix the problem)
-\item {\tt Whisky\_Init\_Data}: Luca Baiotti ({\tt baiotti@ea.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp}) or
+\item {\tt Whisky\_Init\_Data}: Luca Baiotti ({\tt baiotti@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp}) or
   Ian Hawke ({\tt hawke@aei.mpg.de})
 \item {\tt Whisky\_TOVSolverC}: Ian Hawke ({\tt hawke@aei.mpg.de}) or Frank L\"offler ({\tt
-    frank.loeffler@aei.mpg.de})
-\item {\tt Whisky\_IVP}: Frank L\"offler ({\tt frank.loeffler@aei.mpg.de}) 
-  or Luca Baiotti ({\tt baiotti@ea.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp}) or Ian Hawke ({\tt hawke@aei.mpg.de})
+    knarf@cct.lsu.edu})
+\item {\tt Whisky\_IVP}: Frank L\"offler ({\tt knarf@cct.lsu.edu}) 
+  or Luca Baiotti ({\tt baiotti@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp}) or Ian Hawke ({\tt hawke@aei.mpg.de})
 \end{itemize}
 
 \section{Physical System}
@@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ where $\eta_1,\eta_2$ are positive constants and
 \begin{equation}
   \label{eq:ppmetatilde}
   \tilde{\eta} = \left\{ \begin{array}{c l} 
-  \frac{\rho_{i+2} - \rho_{i+2} + 4 \delta\rho_i}{12\delta\rho_i} &
+  \frac{\rho_{i-2} - \rho_{i+2} + 4 \delta\rho_i}{12\delta\rho_i} &
   \textrm{ if } \left\{
 \begin{array}{l}
   \delta^2\rho_{i+1}\delta^2\rho_{i-1} < 0\\
@@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ use of the ADM evolution equation for the 3-metric in the form
 %
 \begin{equation}
   \label{eq:SourceADMg}
-  \partial_t \gamma_{ij} = - 2 \left( \alpha K_{ij} + \partial_{(i}
+  \partial_t \gamma_{ij} = 2\left(- \alpha K_{ij} + \partial_{(i}
   \beta_{j)} - {}^{(3)}\Gamma^k_{ij} \beta_k \right)\ .
 \end{equation}
 %
@@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ and we expand the derivatives as
 \partial_t\big(\gamma_{jk}\beta^j\beta^k\big) = 2\gamma_{jk}\beta^j\partial_t\beta^k +
 \beta^j\beta^k\partial_t\gamma_{jk} = \nonumber \\
  &=& 2\beta_k\partial_t\beta^k -2\alpha K_{jk}
-\beta^j\beta^k - 2\beta^j\beta^k\partial_j\beta_k + 2{}^{(3)}\Gamma^i_{kj} \beta_i\beta^j\beta^k
+\beta^j\beta^k + 2\beta^j\beta^k\partial_j\beta_k - 2{}^{(3)}\Gamma^i_{kj} \beta_i\beta^j\beta^k
 \end{eqnarray}
 %
 and
@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ Other more straightforward calculations give
   {}^{(4)}\Gamma_{l0j} &=& {}^{(4)}\Gamma^\nu_{lj}g_{\nu 0} & =  \alpha K_{lj} + \partial_l\beta_j + \partial_j\beta_l - \beta_k{}^{(3)}\Gamma^k_{lj}\ , \\
 \nonumber\\
   \label{eq:SourceS3c}
-  {}^{(4)}\Gamma_{0lj} &=& {}^{(4)}\Gamma^\nu_{0j}g_{\nu l} & =  -\alpha K_{jl} - \partial_l\beta_j + \beta_k {}^{(3)}\Gamma^k_{lj}\ , \\
+  {}^{(4)}\Gamma_{0lj} &=& {}^{(4)}\Gamma^\nu_{0j}g_{\nu l} & =  -\alpha K_{jl} + \partial_l\beta_j - \beta_k {}^{(3)}\Gamma^k_{lj}\ , \\
 \nonumber\\
   \label{eq:SourceS3d}
   {}^{(4)}\Gamma_{lmj} &=& {}^{(4)}\Gamma^\nu_{lj}g_{\nu m} & =  {}^{(3)}\Gamma_{lmj}\ ,