diff options
author | diener <diener@2a26948c-0e4f-0410-aee8-f1d3e353619c> | 2004-03-03 16:43:25 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | diener <diener@2a26948c-0e4f-0410-aee8-f1d3e353619c> | 2004-03-03 16:43:25 +0000 |
commit | 564c15048d03894c2dd2315c54cebeb07ebf70be (patch) | |
tree | 73844ef28b7d9836867bdbedc2e4e72daec65232 /param.ccl | |
parent | cc166f4d2e715bdfdef04e217602a18acdbef1ae (diff) |
Added a cheat parameter to enable the reuse of the final data set for a
number of iterations before starting the real backwards evolution of the
level set function. If everything is stationary this should be okay. If it
is only approximately stationary, the evolution of the level set function
is dubious but the trial surfaces might get closer to the real event horizon.
Testing is definitely necessary. Don't use it unless you really know what you
are doing.
The implementation is also slightly dubious, since I modify cctk_iteration
to start out with negative iteration numbers. There might be a more elegant
way of doing this.
git-svn-id: http://svn.einsteintoolkit.org/cactus/EinsteinAnalysis/EHFinder/trunk@167 2a26948c-0e4f-0410-aee8-f1d3e353619c
Diffstat (limited to 'param.ccl')
-rw-r--r-- | param.ccl | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ BOOLEAN read_conformal_factor_once "Should the conformal factor only be read onc { } "yes" +BOOLEAN cheat "Should we cheat and evolve using the last data set for a while?" +{ +} "no" + +CCTK_INT cheat_iterations "For how many iterations should we cheat" +{ +0:* :: "Positive please" +} 0 + KEYWORD initial_f[10] "Initial surface choice" { "sphere" :: "spherical surface" |