summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/soc.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDiego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>2006-08-07 09:59:21 +0000
committerDiego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>2006-08-07 09:59:21 +0000
commita67a96a0538135341e00d76eb504b3f1143ac9dd (patch)
treec76345da2a4fdbece8f4a9bdedd323a55742016e /doc/soc.txt
parent4f9807d8f89de26362db7749832f916d5bb9f78e (diff)
editorial changes
Originally committed as revision 5942 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/soc.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/soc.txt18
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/doc/soc.txt b/doc/soc.txt
index a7472fb6f2..8b4a86db80 100644
--- a/doc/soc.txt
+++ b/doc/soc.txt
@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
-Google Summer of Code and similar project guidlines
+Google Summer of Code and similar project guidelines
-Summer of code is a project by google in which students are paid to implement
+Summer of Code is a project by Google in which students are paid to implement
some nice new features for various participating open source projects ...
-This text is a collection of things to take care off for the next soc as
-its a little late for this years soc (2006)
+This text is a collection of things to take care of for the next soc as
+it's a little late for this year's soc (2006).
The Goal:
Our goal in respect to soc is and must be of course exactly one thing and
that is to improve FFmpeg, to reach this goal, code must
-* conform to the svn policy and patch submission guidlines
-* must improve ffmpeg somehow (faster, smaller, "better",
+* conform to the svn policy and patch submission guidelines
+* must improve FFmpeg somehow (faster, smaller, "better",
more codecs supported, fewer bugs, cleaner, ...)
for mentors and other developers to help students to reach that goal it is
-essential that changes to their codebase are publically vissible, clean and
+essential that changes to their codebase are publicly visible, clean and
easy reviewable that again leads us to:
* use of a revision control system like svn
-* seperation of cosmetic from non cosmetic changes (this is almost entirly
+* separation of cosmetic from non-cosmetic changes (this is almost entirely
ignored by mentors and students in soc 2006 which might lead to a suprise
when the code will be reviewed at the end before a possible inclusion in
- ffmpeg, individual changes where generally not reviewable due to cosmetics)
+ FFmpeg, individual changes were generally not reviewable due to cosmetics).
* frequent commits, so that comments can be provided early