| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As far as I can tell using a separate process doesn't actually improve
performance, it makes it worse. The work that we're passing off to the
separate function isn't necessarily work that's well suited to being
handed off, there isn't a lot of computation and the objects that need
to be passed across the pipe are fairly large (at least when considering
a pipe). Converting the function to a generator gives better performance
and simplifies the implementation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Python3 only supports "new-style" classes (those extending object),
and we don't need to explicitly inherit from this root class any more.
See http://pylint-messages.wikidot.com/messages:c1001
|
| |
|
|
| |
or tags common to all messages in thread
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a pretty invasive patch, since the ui code is used so
extensively, it requires going into a lot of other code and converting
those to coroutines, since before they returned deferred's.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Found due to another bug :)
|
| |
|
|
| |
that displays the named query strings stored in the notmuch database
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
.. that accidentally got dropped during c86623d9c7daaa2f9a832135a11870a0d91110a3
This fixes #1255
|
| |
|
|
| |
see also #1250
|
|
|
This splits buffers.py, which contained all buffer classes, into several smaller files.
issue #1226
|
