From bc1557328359a09461ea36577c60f60fecda511b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Diego Biurrun Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:14:28 +0000 Subject: link fix by Dujardin Bernard, dujardin.iut numericable fr Originally committed as revision 8028 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk --- doc/faq.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'doc/faq.texi') diff --git a/doc/faq.texi b/doc/faq.texi index 70620bb24c..8c9d9ab7d8 100644 --- a/doc/faq.texi +++ b/doc/faq.texi @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ No. These tools are too bloated and they complicate the build. ffmpeg is already organized in a highly modular manner and does not need to be rewritten in a formal object language. Further, many of the developers favor straight C; it works for them. For more arguments on this matter, -read "Programming Religion" at (@url{http://lkml.org/faq/lkmlfaq-15.html}). +read "Programming Religion" at (@url{http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s15}). @section Why are the ffmpeg programs devoid of debugging symbols ? -- cgit v1.2.3