diff options
| author | Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de> | 2007-04-21 11:35:28 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de> | 2007-04-21 11:35:28 +0000 |
| commit | 4a7a090834591d2ff090ce487038efa6b83af43e (patch) | |
| tree | d3df735fa7b2f0e520eea10df311e8050532193b /doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi | |
| parent | 11fde35d7c0cfc0dead5c9bfd01e7f597b0da4c2 (diff) | |
spelling/wording/punctuation
Originally committed as revision 8768 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi | 14 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi index bae8851d4f..14a7cf7d06 100644 --- a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi +++ b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi @@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ do not attach several unrelated patches to the same mail. @item Is the patch a unified diff? @item - Is the patch against latest ffmpeg SVN? + Is the patch against latest FFmpeg SVN? @item Are you subscribed to ffmpeg-dev? (the list is subscribers only due to spam) @@ -1640,22 +1640,24 @@ do not attach several unrelated patches to the same mail. Have you checked that the changes are minimal, so that the same cannot be achieved with a smaller patch and/or simpler final code? @item - If the change is to speed critical code did you benchmark it? + If the change is to speed critical code, did you benchmark it? @item Have you checked that the patch does not introduce buffer overflows or other security issues? @item - Is the patch made from the root of the source, so it can be applied with -p0? + Is the patch created from the root of the source tree, so it can be + applied with @code{patch -p0}? @item Does the patch not mix functional and cosmetic changes? @item Is the patch attached to the email you send? @item - Is the mime type of the patch correct? (not application/octet-stream) + Is the mime type of the patch correct? It should be text/x-diff or + text/x-patch or at least text/plain and not application/octet-stream. @item - If the patch fixes a bug did you provide a verbose analysis of the bug? + If the patch fixes a bug, did you provide a verbose analysis of the bug? @item - If the patch fixes a bug did you provide enough information, including + If the patch fixes a bug, did you provide enough information, including a sample, so the bug can be reproduced and the fix can be verified? @item Did you provide a verbose summary about what the patch does change? |